ladyluckless: (Default)
[personal profile] ladyluckless
Am I a bad, awful, terrible person for pointing out the many logical flaws in the argument of someone who was trying to agree with me? Because really, he or she (it was on an anonymous discussion board for a class) was being really stupid and was making claims that had no basis in reality or what I actually said. It isn't even as though I had written a ton on the subject either--once I reached eight pages I realized that no one would ever read it and so I cut two of the three sections and parsed the rest down until it was a readable chunk. Reading comprehension people, do you have it?

I still have more posts I'm required to comment on, but must wait for the students to post. Since it is an hour before class starts and this is due today they should start showing up soon. Why is it so hard to write a discussion post in a timely manner that is not full of stupid? Or that contains punctuation?

Edit- Someone finally posted something. It's really hard to respond to thing in an intelligent and insightful manner when I have to translate from the original Martian.

Profile

ladyluckless: (Default)
ladyluckless

May 2008

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags